AES DIALAC® SE40 UMG JAPAN
168
- Unit Price:
- $3714 USD/MT
- Packaging Specification:
- 25 KG/PKG
- Supply Quantity:
- 38MT
- Delivery Terms:
- FOB
- Port of Loading:
- China Main Port
- Accepted Payment Methods:
- T/T
- Shipping:
- Negotiate supplier for shipping details
Supplier Information
ASIA PLASTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED
+86 755 2787 3515
serv********
For more detailed information including pricing, customization, and shipping, please contact supplier.
Material Description
Technical Data Sheet
Material Description
- Material Properties:--
- Application Areas:--
- Color:--
- Grade:Injection grade
Technical Data Sheet
| Physical Properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modeling Shrinkage | MD：23°C | ISO294-4 | 0.60到0.80 | % |
| Melt Volume flow Rate | 220°C/10.0kg | ISO1133 | 8.00 | cm3/10min |
| Mechanical Properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexural Modulus | 23°C | ISO178 | 2250 | Mpa |
| Flexural Stress | 23°C | ISO178 | 69.0 | Mpa |
| Tensile Stress | 23°C | ISO527-2 | 45.0 | Mpa |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | 27 | KJ/m | ||
| Tensile Modulus | 23°C | ISO527-2 | 2200 | Mpa |
| Flexural Modulus | 2250 | Mpa |
| Thermal Properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deflection Temperature Under Load? | 80 | °C | ||
| 1.8MPa,Unannealed | ISO75-2/Af | 80.0 | °C | |
| Flame Rating | UL94 | HB | ||
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient | MD | ISO11359-2 | 9E-05 | cm/cm/°C |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Hardness | R-Sale,23°C | ISO2039-2 | 100 |
| Flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL flame retardant rating | 1.5mm | UL94 | HB |
| Physical | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melt index | 8 | CM |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.