PA66 LUMID® GP2301BF LG CHEM KOREA

Unit Price:
$4447 USD/MT
Packaging Specification:
25KG/PKG
Supply Quantity:
62MT
Delivery Terms:
FOB
Port of Loading:
China Main Port
Accepted Payment Methods:
T/T
Shipping:
Negotiate supplier for shipping details

Supplier Information

ASIA PLASTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED

serv********

For more detailed information including pricing, customization, and shipping, please contact supplier.

Technical Data Sheet

Physical Properties	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
Modeling Shrinkage	MD：3.20mm	ASTMD955	0.40to0.90	%
Moisture Absorption	23°C,24hr	ASTMD570	0.60	%

Mechanical Properties	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
Flexural Modulus	3.20mm	ASTMD790	9810	Mpa
Flexural Strength	Yield,3.20mm	ASTMD790	245	Mpa
Tensile Elongation	Break,3.20mm	ASTMD638	3.5	%
Tensile Strength	Break,3.20mm	ASTMD638	157	Mpa

Thermal Properties	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
Peak Melting Temperature		ASTMD3418	260	°C
RTIElec	0.75mm	UL746	100100120	°C
Evolution Calendar intelligent importer	1.5mm	UL746	110110120	°C
RTIStr	3.0mm	UL746	110110120	°C
Linear thermal expansion coefficient	MD	ASTMD696	3E-05	cm/cm/°C
Deflection Temperature Under Load?	0.45MPa,Unannealed,6.40mm	ASTMD648	255	°C
Deflection Temperature Under Load?	Deflection Temperature Under Load?	1.8MPa,Unannealed,6.40mm	ASTMD648	250	°C

Electrical performance	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
Dielectric Constant	1MHz	ASTMD150	3.00
Volume Resistivity		ASTMD257	1E+14	ohms·cm
Dielectric Strength	1.00mm	ASTMD149	22	KV/mm
Comparative Tracking Index	SolutionA	IEC60112	250	V
Comparative Tracking Index	CTI)4	UL746	250	V

hardness	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
Rockwell Hardness	R-Scale	ASTMD785	120

Flammability	Test Condition	Test Method	Test Result	Unit
UL flame retardant rating	0.75mm	UL94	V-0
	UL flame retardant rating	1.5mm	UL94	V-0
	UL flame retardant rating	UL flame retardant rating	3.0mm	UL94	V-0

IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.