PA66 Leona™ 54G33 ASAHI JAPAN
112
- Unit Price:
- $3813 USD/MT
- Packaging Specification:
- 25 KG/PKG
- Supply Quantity:
- 73MT
- Delivery Terms:
- FOB
- Port of Loading:
- China Main Port
- Accepted Payment Methods:
- T/T
- Shipping:
- Negotiate supplier for shipping details
Supplier Information
ASIA PLASTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED
+86 755 2787 3515View
serv********View
For more detailed information including pricing, customization, and shipping, please contact supplier.
Material Description
Technical Data Sheet
Material Description
- Material Properties:Good appearance Glass fiber reinforced High impact resistance High rigidity high strength
- Application Areas:Office supplies furniture Insulation material
- Color:--
- Grade:Injection grade
Technical Data Sheet
Compare
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shrinkage rate | 干 | 旭化成方法 | 0.4/0.9 | % |
| Mechanical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell hardness | 干(湿) | ASTM D-785 | 120(110) | R scale |
| Cantilever beam notch impact strength | 干(湿) | ASTM D-256 | 137(196) | J/m |
| Scratch resistance coefficient | 干(湿) | ASTM D-790 | 9.1(5.0) | GPa |
| Flexural strength | 干(湿) | ASTM D-790 | 289(167) | Mpa |
| Fracture elongation rate | 干(湿) | ASTM D-638 | 3(7) | % |
| tensile strength | 干(湿) | ASTM D-638 | 181(118) | Mpa |
| Rockwell hardness | 干(湿) | ASTM D-785 | 93(68) | M Scale |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot deformation temperature | 1.82MPa,干 | ASTM D-648 | 240 | °C |
| Linear expansion coefficient | 干 | ASTM D-696 | 3 | |
| Flame retardancy | 干 | UL 94 | HB | |
| Hot deformation temperature | 0.46MPa,干 | ASTM D-648 | 250 | °C |
| Basic performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture absorption rate | 湿 | 1.9 | % |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.