Technical Data Sheet
Compare
physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Density/specific gravity | | ISO1183 | 1.26 | g/cm³ |
Melt mass flow rate | 240°C/2.16kg | ISO1133 | 13 | g/10min |
Melt volume flow rate | 240°C/2.16kg | ISO1133 | 12.0 | cm3/10min |
Shrinkage rate | TD | ISO294-4 | 1.6 | % |
Shrinkage rate | MD | ISO294-4 | 1.6 | % |
Water absorption rate | 23°C,24hr | ISO62 | 0.30 | % |
Water absorption rate | Saturation,23°C,2.00mm | ISO62 | 0.60 | % |
Water absorption rate | Equilibrium,23°C,2.00mm,50%RH | ISO62 | 0.20 | % |
Mechanical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Tensile creep modulus | 1000hr | ISO899-1 | 310 | Mpa |
Bending modulus | | ISO178 | 550 | Mpa |
abrasion resistance | | ISO4649 | 100 | mm³ |
Tensile modulus | | ISO527-2 | 550 | Mpa |
Tensile stress | Yield | ISO527-2 | 26.0 | Mpa |
Tensile stress | Break | ISO527-2 | 50.0 | Mpa |
Tensile stress | 5.0%Strain | ISO527-2 | 14.0 | Mpa |
Tensile stress | 10%Strain | ISO527-2 | 23.0 | Mpa |
Tensile stress | 50%Strain | ISO527-2 | 24.0 | Mpa |
Tensile strain | Yield | ISO527-2 | 26 | % |
Tensile strain | Break | ISO527-2 | >300 | % |
Nominal tensile fracture strain | | ISO527-2 | 530 | % |
Tensile creep modulus | 1hr | ISO899-1 | 360 | Mpa |
Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Hot deformation temperature | 0.45MPa,Unannealed | ISO75-2/B | 100 | °C |
Hot deformation temperature | 1.8MPa,Unannealed | ISO75-2/A | 50.0 | °C |
Brittle temperature | | ISO974 | -97.0 | °C |
Glass transition temperature 3 | | ISO11357-2 | 25.0 | °C |
Vicat softening temperature | -- | ISO306/A50 | 205 | °C |
Vicat softening temperature | -- | ISO306/B50 | 140 | °C |
Melting temperature 3 | | ISO11357-3 | 218 | °C |
Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | MD | ISO11359-2 | 1.8E-04 | cm/cm/°C |
Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | TD | ISO11359-2 | 1.7E-04 | cm/cm/°C |
Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | EffectiveThermalDiffusivity | ISO11359-2 | 8E-08 | m²/s |
Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Surface resistivity | | IEC60093 | >1.0E+15 | ohms |
Volume resistivity | | IEC60093 | 2E+12 | ohms·cm |
Dielectric strength | | IEC60243-1 | 20 | KV/mm |
Relative permittivity | 100Hz | IEC60250 | 4.00 | |
Relative permittivity | 1MHz | IEC60250 | 3.50 | |
Dissipation factor | 100Hz | IEC60250 | 0.016 | |
Dissipation factor | 1MHz | IEC60250 | 0.030 | |
Leakage Trace Index | | IEC60112 | 600 | V |
elastomer | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
tear strength | Across Flow | ISO34-1 | 170 | kN/m |
tear strength | 流量 | ISO34-1 | 180 | kN/m |
Filling analysis | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Melt density | | | 1.11 | g/cm³ |
SpecificHeatCapacity of Melt | | | 2150 | J/kg/°C |
ThermalConductivityofMelt | | | 0.15 | W/m/K |
Impact performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Charpy Notched Impact Strength | -40°C | ISO179/1eA | 7.0 | kJ/m² |
Charpy Notched Impact Strength | -30°C | ISO179/1eA | 8.0 | kJ/m² |
Charpy Notched Impact Strength | 23°C | ISO179/1eA | 36 | kJ/m² |
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | -40°C | ISO180/1A | 7.0 | kJ/m² |
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | 23°C | ISO180/1A | 38 | kJ/m² |
Tensile impact strength | 23°C | ISO8256/1 | 300 | kJ/m² |
hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Shore hardness | Shore D | ISO868 | 68 | |
Shore hardness | Shore D,15sec | ISO868 | 64 | |
flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
Extreme Oxygen Index | | ISO4589-2 | 23 | % |
Burning rate 4 | 1.00mm | ISO3795 | DNI | |
UL flame retardant rating | 1.5mm | UL94,IEC60695-11-10,-20 | HB | |
Supplementary Information | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Unit |
---|
EmissionofOrganicCompounds | | VDA277 | 300 | µgC/g |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.